Back to Research papers
Research paper index

Reinforcement Learning for Heterogeneous Sensor Selection in Maritime Surveillance

Andrei Starodubov, Yaqub Aris Prabowo, Andreas Hadjipieris, Roberto Galeazzi, Ioannis Kyriakides

arXiv:2607.22667Published July 3, 2026Updated September 2, 20260 citations
  • cs.AI
  • cs.IT
  • cs.LG
  • cs.RO
  • eess.SP
  • eess.SY
  • policy
  • reinforcement learning

Abstract

This paper presents an information-gain-guided reinforcement-learning sensor-selection framework for single-vessel tracking in heterogeneous maritime sensor networks. The proposed approach is motivated by information-theoretic sensor management: instead of activating all sensors or repeatedly performing computationally expensive online expected-information-gain evaluation, a learned policy selects one tracking-relevant sensor at each decision epoch. A Bayesian sequential Monte Carlo tracker estimates the vessel state from noisy measurements and provides a belief representation for scheduling under nonlinear and non-Gaussian conditions. A Proximal Policy Optimization agent selects one of five sensors in a georeferenced simulation of the CMMI Smart Marina testbed at Ayia Napa Marina, Cyprus. The policy is trained on the testbed's actual five-sensor configuration. The agent observes belief-state, detection-history, coverage, sensor-geometry, and realized-information-gain features. The reward is defined as a realized-information-gain term gated by an observability mask. Final-test simulations compare the proposed framework with random single-sensor selection, always-on sensing using all sensors simultaneously, and the expected-information-gain sensor-selection baseline proposed in our previous work. Results show that the learned policy achieves tracking performance close to always-on sensing while activating only one sensor per decision time step and avoiding the computationally expensive online entropy search required by expected-information-gain selection. Additional zero-shot evaluation without retraining on ten moderately perturbed versions of actual layout configuration showed broadly stable tracking, with any increase in positional tracking error remaining below 1 meter across all perturbations.

Read the original paper

This page indexes public paper metadata. The manuscript remains with its original publisher and authors.