Back to Research papers
Research paper index

DreamTrajectory: Trajectory-Guided Action Generation with World Model Alignment for Mobile Manipulation

Zheng Yang, Wenjie Zhang, Xiangyu Chen, Wenxuan Song, Xianpeng Wang, Yihang Kang, Jiawen Wen, Wen Chen, Lujia Wang, Renjing Xu, Haoang Li, Xiaowen Chu

arXiv:2608.01381Published August 2, 2026Updated August 25, 20260 citations
  • cs.RO
  • trajectory
  • manipulation
  • action
  • end-effector
  • vision-language
  • robot
  • policy

Abstract

Mobile manipulation requires a robot to coordinate base and arm motion under continuously changing viewpoints and contact conditions, within an action space far larger than that of fixed-base manipulation. Existing Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies are limited in two respects. (i)They map observations directly to whole-body action chunks, searching this large action space without an explicit task-space motion plan, which makes coordinated base--arm prediction imprecise. (ii)They execute the predicted chunk open-loop, without checking whether the actions can realize the motion the policy intended, so control errors and unmodeled contacts accumulate into a gap between planned and realized motion. We present DreamTrajectory, a trajectory-guided framework for language-conditioned mobile manipulation that introduces one component for each limitation. Addressing(i), DreamTrajectory jointly predicts an intention-level end-effector trajectory and a whole-body action chunk in a single action expert, so that the trajectory explicitly guides base--arm action generation instead of remaining implicit. Addressing(ii), a lightweight trajectory world model predicts the trajectory that a candidate action chunk would induce, and a test-time search--predict--score procedure selects the candidate best aligned with the planned trajectory. On MS-HAB, trajectory guidance raises average success from 32.3% to 47.5% and test-time refinement further to 54.8%, with the largest gains on contact-rich articulated-object tasks. On three real-world mobile manipulation tasks, the corresponding average success rates are 63.3%, 81.7%, and 90.0%.

Read the original paper

This page indexes public paper metadata. The manuscript remains with its original publisher and authors.