Back to Research papers
Research paper index

Clinical Feasibility of Low-Magnification Fluorescence Imaging for Breast Cancer Margin Detection Using Texture Analysis and Deep Learning

Pouya Afshin, Tianling Niu, Tongtong Lu, David Helminiak, Julie Jorns, Mollie Patton, Tina Yen, Donghye Ye, Bing Yu

arXiv:2608.11317Published August 11, 20260 citations
  • cs.CV
  • cs.AI
  • cs.LG

Abstract

High-resolution images of unprocessed surgical breast tissue can be obtained using microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation (MUSE). This technique is considered a promising method for checking surgical margins during breast cancer surgery. In this study, MUSE images at 4x and 10x magnifications were compared using patch-level classification methods. Texture analysis (TA) based on local binary patterns (LBP) and deep learning (DL) with a base Vision Transformer (ViT) model were used. Both methods achieved similar performance at both magnifications. Using DL method, both 4x and 10x magnifications achieved 96.30% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 98.18% accuracy. Using TA method, 4x achieved better specificity (100% vs 93.33%) and 10x yielded higher sensitivity (100% vs 93.33%), but both had the same accuracy (96.67%). No clear improvement in performance was observed with 10x magnification. These results show that 4x imaging achieves the same diagnostic accuracy as 10x imaging. At the same time, 4x offers a larger field of view and faster image capture. Therefore, lower magnification can be effectively used in MUSE systems for accurate and efficient intraoperative margin assessment.

Read the original paper

This page indexes public paper metadata. The manuscript remains with its original publisher and authors.