Back to Research papers
Research paper index

CheckVLA: Execution-Time Verification with Action-Conditioned World Model for Long-Horizon Mobile Manipulation

Yushan Liu, Peibo Sun, Xintao Chao, Zhenyang Yang, Yifan Xie, Lingfeng Zhang, Shoujie Li, Chenyu Tang, Fang Chen, Xiao-Ping Zhang, Wenbo Ding

arXiv:2607.26789Published July 29, 20260 citations
  • cs.RO
  • policy
  • manipulation
  • action
  • vision-language

Abstract

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies commonly execute long-horizon mobile manipulation through open-loop action chunks, issuing multiple actions without receiving new high-level visual input. A committed chunk therefore implies how observations should evolve, but accidental deviations can violate this expectation while the remaining actions continue to propagate the error: commit-time policy confidence cannot react to a deviation that occurs after dispatch, and observation-only anomaly scores lack an action-conditioned reference for separating expected effects from unexplained changes. We propose CheckVLA, which verifies execution with a separately trained, frozen action-conditioned world model. A conformally calibrated risk threshold bounds the episode-level probability of an unnecessary first intervention and determines when to intervene, its exceedance controls how strongly the rewritten suffix retains the superseded chunk, latency-aware hard prefixing restricts replacement to actions that remain deployable, and an event-driven keyframe bank preserves evidence of prior progress across repairs. On RoboCasa365, under a common training recipe and a matched invocation budget, CheckVLA attains a 36.1% average success rate against 27.6% for periodic replanning (+8.5 points). At a matched 5% episode-level false-alarm target, action conditioning raises timely recall to 77.9%, against 48.6% for an observation-only control and 37.9% for an action-shuffled control. These simulation results support action-conditioned verification as a way to restore feedback during chunked execution while keeping the repair consistent with inference latency.

Read the original paper

This page indexes public paper metadata. The manuscript remains with its original publisher and authors.