Covariant logo

Covariant

StartupBerkeley, CA, United StatesFounded 2017

Developed RFM-1, a robotics foundation model trained on data from its warehouse pick-and-place deployments.

Overview

Covariant is a Bay Area AI robotics company founded in 2017 by Pieter Abbeel, Peter Chen, Rocky Duan and others, which builds AI models for warehouse picking and fulfillment robots. In August 2024 Amazon hired its three co-founders and about a quarter of its staff and took a non-exclusive license to its robotic foundation models. Covariant continues to operate independently under CEO Ted Stinson.

Sources: prnewswire.com (6 May 2020) · aboutamazon.com (30 Aug 2024) · techcrunch.com (31 Aug 2024)

Type
Startup
Headquarters
Berkeley, CA, United Statesprnewswire.com, 6 May 2020
Founded
2017prnewswire.com, 6 May 2020

Key people

  • Ted StinsonCEO (formerly COO)techcrunch.com, 31 Aug 2024
  • Tianhao ZhangCo-leader of Covariant after August 2024techcrunch.com, 31 Aug 2024
  • Pieter AbbeelCo-founder, former President and Chief Scientist; joined Amazon in 2024aboutamazon.com, 30 Aug 2024
  • Peter ChenCo-founder and former CEO; joined Amazon in 2024aboutamazon.com, 30 Aug 2024
  • Rocky DuanCo-founder; joined Amazon in 2024aboutamazon.com, 30 Aug 2024

Funding history

Private company · In August 2024 Amazon hired Covariant's co-founders and about a quarter of its staff and licensed its models on a non-exclusive basis; Covariant was not acquired. · $195M disclosed in USD across 3 of 3 listed rounds

Funding rounds for Covariant
DateRoundAmountLeadSource
6 May 2020Series B$40MIndex Venturestechcrunch.com, 6 May 2020
27 Jul 2021Series C$80MIndex Venturestechcrunch.com, 27 Jul 2021
4 Apr 2023Series C extension$75MRadical Ventures, Index Venturestechcrunch.com, 4 Apr 2023

Ranking

#83 of 104 model companies · score 8.4 / 100 · updated 19 Oct 2026

  • Published benchmarks 35%0%
  • Open weights 20%0%
  • Adoption 20%0%
  • Released models 15%20%
  • Disclosed funding 10%54%

Each bar shows an input from 0 to 100% before weighting. 0 of 1 listed models have open weights.

How we rank model companies

The score (0–100) measures public, checkable evidence about a company's robot models. It does not measure private capability. A company that publishes no benchmark results and no weights can still have strong models. Every input is computed from the data on each company page, and every number there links to its source.

InputWeightHow it is measured
Published benchmarks35%For each scored benchmark, the company's best result divided by the best result any company has published, averaged over the benchmarks it reports. No published results scores 0. Results come only from the model's own paper, model card or the official benchmark leaderboard. Scored: LIBERO (4-suite average success, %); SimplerEnv Google Robot, visual matching (%); SimplerEnv Google Robot, variant aggregation (%); SimplerEnv WidowX / Bridge (%); CALVIN ABC→D (average length, 0–5); RoboArena (pairwise rating).
Open weights20%Share of the company's listed models whose weights the public can download.
Adoption20%GitHub stars on the company's most-starred official model repository, on a log scale relative to the most-starred repository in the list. Hugging Face downloads are shown on company pages but not scored, because gated repositories report zero.
Released models15%Number of publicly announced, named models, capped at 5.
Disclosed funding10%The sum of the funding rounds listed on the company's profile that were disclosed in USD, on a log scale from $10M to the largest sum in the list. Rounds reported only in other currencies are listed but not converted or counted. This input applies only to private startups and robot makers. For big-tech divisions, research labs and listed companies it is n/a, and its weight is shared across the other inputs in proportion.

Sources. arXiv papers and official model cards for benchmarks and parameters; official leaderboards (RoboArena); the GitHub and Hugging Face APIs for stars and downloads; company announcements and established press for funding. Missing values are shown as n/a, never estimated.

Updated 19 Oct 2026. Benchmark protocols differ between papers, for example in fine-tuning and number of trials, so small gaps between close scores are not meaningful.

Submit or correct data →

Closed or unreleased-weights models (1)

Covariant logo

RFM-1

Closed weightsVLA

Multimodal robotics foundation model trained on data from Covariant's warehouse pick-and-place fleet; accepts text and image inputs and predicts actions and video.

Released
11 Mar 2024
Parameters
8B
License
Proprietary (non-exclusively licensed to Amazon, Aug 2024)
Embodiments
single-arm
GitHub stars
n/a
HF downloads (all time)
n/a

No benchmark results on a shared public benchmark have been published for this model.